The following illustration shows how the monotube counterflow design functions
Note that the exhaust gas leaves the portion of the heating coil that has the lowest temperature fluid -- the feedwater. For this reason, the exhaust temperature at low fire rates is actually lower than the steam temperature. It should be pointed out that the stack temperature of the Clayton Steam Generator is limited by the feedwater temperature. Stack temperature in the conventional boiler is limited to steam temperature.
In operation stack temperature is an indication of relative efficiency. The lower the stack temperature, the higher the efficiency -- assuming that other conditions such as CO2, O2 and radiation losses remain equal. At partial loading the stack temperature is lower because of the proportionally greater heat transfer surface, e.g. at 50 percent load, the heating surface per BTU transferred is twice that at 100 percent load. The stack temperature can only approach the temperature of the heating surface at the point of exit of the flue gases: steam temperature for the fire-tube, feedwater temperature for the Clayton Steam Generator. Because boilers operate at less than full rated load most of the time, partial load efficiency is more important than full load performance.
Figure 2 shows a graph of the typical stack temperatures for a conventional boiler and a Clayton Steam Generator, each at 14 bar steam pressure. The graph shows the dramatic difference between the two temperatures at the lower firing ranges. Both types have essentially equal temperatures at 100 percent rating.
At 50 percent rating the Clayton unit is 60˚C lower. At 20 percent rating the temperature is 85˚C lower. The lower portion of the graph shows the difference in temperatures and emphasizes the difference in the typical load range of 30 to 70 percent.
Figure 3 illustrates typical efficiencies for Clayton Steam Generators and fire-tube boilers at all loads from 0 to 100 percent rating. Note that for the Clayton unit the curve is higher at the lower firing rate than it is at 100 percent. This is partly due to the increasing ratio of heating surface to fuel input, partly due to relatively small heat radiation loss, but most importantly because of the counterflow coil that is unique to the Clayton design.
At full load the efficiencies are virtually identical, for competitive reasons. With the fire-tube boiler, efficiency falls off at the lower rates because radiation loss is constant and therefore becomes an increasing detriment at low firing rates.